14 Comments
User's avatar
Miles Fidelman's avatar

Some people understand the notion of investment, creativity, and growth. Some folks just know how to hunt, gather, and extract; Some know how to plant, nurture, and husband. Short term, long term. Pretty simple, really. No magical thinking necessary.

Scott Britton's avatar

I think there’s room for both perspectives : )

Miles Fidelman's avatar

Greed vs. Gardening? Otherwise, it sure seems like we're saying the same thing.

"Purpose + intention + integrity" - in other words, "investing" (time, attention, effort) in things that grow, vs. simply harvesting non-renewable (anything). Or... as the saying goes, "those who are not busy living, are busy dying." It's a matter of mindset, and attitude. Nothing particularly magical or mystical about it - basic physics & cognitive science. (Then again - there is something a bit magical about the fact that, if you pour energy into a closed system, order spontaneously develops. :-) )

Scott Britton's avatar

I think the main distinction that implies mysticism or connection to something greater than predictable cause and effect is the notion that certain gardening activities like generosity to others without expectation result in improbable or unexplainable phenomenon or good fortune. I'm not sure if you have experienced that, but I have. It points to the same virtues, but seems like a slightly expanded reality paradigm of cause and effect than just doing good deeds

Miles Fidelman's avatar

Ok... but "what goes around, comes around" doesn't really require a mystical explanation - be it karma or quantum weirdness. Attitude, contribution to the general zeitgeist. Kind of like faith healing - mostly the placebo effect - can be triggered with meditation or hypnosis just as easily as laying on of hands. As an Engineer, I've found the more direct explanation is more likely to "work."

Caroline Lee Dewey's avatar

It's so refreshing to hear people discuss abundance in these terms. More about being a receiver or channel for good which you then give back to the whole. More about the WE and less about ME ME ME...

Many teachers out there are still limiting their students by keeping them focused on the "I" instead of helping them to focus on the "1" and it's a very subtle but very distinct difference.

I really enjoyed this read and am looking forward to tuning in for the full video as well. Thanks!

Scott Britton's avatar

Wow I love the I vs. 1 distinction. It’s so true in my own experience and love how perfectly this characterizes it. Thanks for your support!

Caroline Lee Dewey's avatar

You’re most welcome! And yes, the oneness is where its at, for sure. Such an important process for us to discover our uniqueness, as well as our interconnectedness, as single cells in the organism of creation. 🤯 Lots to unpack there!

Ahta's avatar

Love this. Also, from the Upanishads, "From Abundance, Abundance is taken, and yet full Abundance remains." Meaning True Abundance is not subject to any quantitative limits. For instance, true love. No matter how much love we co-create in ourselves, and with other beings, it never subtracts any love from the grand "collective energy field of love" . Our loving thoughts and actions always add to this ever-expanding field of love.

Scott Britton's avatar

I love seeing this ancient reference. I def believe that the notion of limitation of source is an illusion created and reinforced by our conditioning…it takes a lot of time to unwind

Thomas White's avatar

I am grateful for your commitment to learning and sharing your journey so openly.

Scott Britton's avatar

Thanks! It’s a genuine joy for me so happy to do it